Wednesday, October 12, 2005

Can Satan Read Minds?

(this post was revised in September 2008)

It's interesting. Can Satan know our thoughts? In Virginia, my pastor thought not. His reasoning was that a Christian cannot be possessed. But I don’t see where reading or tempting a mind controls it.

Satan is powerful and smart. That’s clear. If reading minds it is a matter of ability, Satan could do it. He is not all-knowing; he's just likely the smartest creature in creation. I read authors saying Satan is dumb. That’s dubious. If Satan is dumb, we (mankind) are dumber.

God can read our thoughts. Psalms 94:11 (and Matthew 12:25) says, God (and Jesus) knows the thoughts of men. So it is possible to read thoughts. Let's turn this around. If Satan can speak to our minds, can he read them? Let’s start with the question: can Satan speak to our minds?

A friend argues that temptations are generic. That because we are human Satan knows our weaknesses. Personalized temptations are illusions. But my experience is of very specific temptations – I don’t struggle with gambling, for example, and I am never tempted by it.

James 1 says our own evil desires drag us away and entice us. That might suggest that the “personalized” temptations are actually those things with which we tempt ourselves. Sometimes, in regards to temptation, Satan isn’t involved. I do believe that.

In the Bible, Satan tempts physically and audibly. In Genesis 2, the serpent talks to Eve. In Matthew 4, Satan stands next to Jesus on the hilltop. Still, Satan gets credit for some invisible temptations. In 2 Corinthians 4 he blinds the unbelieving mind. In Ephesians he darkens understanding.

None of these say Satan can speak directly to our minds.

The armor of God is Truth, Righteousness, Peace, Faith, Salvation, the Word, and Prayer. None of these implies mind games. Although it’s worth saying that all these physical symbols don’t really imply anything physical, either.

In Daniel 2 the king has a dream. The sorcerers can’t help. Wouldn’t Satan have “enabled” them to read the king’s mind his own evil ends? We can’t say. Plus the dream was divine in origin and purpose – maybe that makes a difference.

No in 2 Corinthians 2:11 we read, "For whom among men knows the thoughts of a man except the man's spirit within him." Does this mean the spirit can read thoughts? It’s not clear. It might just mean our inner-man is who knows our heart.

None of these say Satan can read our minds.

I suppose, since Satan is a spirit and our spirit knows our heart – he might easily related/connect/speak to our spirit and thereby know our heart. In too ways, though, this is another way of saying the same thing. Satan can read our mind.

Do our thoughts matter?

Proverbs 24:9 says foolish thoughts themselves are sin. Matthew 5 says lust is adultery. It’s clear that thoughts matter – at least to God. If his temple is going to be our heart – he’s interested for obvious reasons. We also know that actions reflect thoughts – so the heart’s condition is important.

Let’s consider the logical problem.

If Satan requires us to talk in order to know our heart – he cannot know what uniquely tempts a mute person. If Satan requires us to talk in order to know our heart – we should never speak our problems aloud to counselors, in confession, or during corporate prayer. But that’s silly.

Is it possible Satan does not tempt us at all, that we tempt ourselves? The Bible defines him as a tempter. And we have many examples where he tempts people – and tempts them personally (not with generic human temptations). He clearly tempts us – sometimes.

Let me interject that I believe we do tempt ourselves as a result of our sinful nature. However, we also know one of Satan’s roles as prince of God’s earth is as tempter.

Is it possible that Satan is a psychologist? Does he look at our actions and with genius discern our hearts? It’s possible. But Adam and Eve make that difficult. They provided insufficient raw material. Still, it doesn’t take too much analysis to superficially understand most a person from his actions.

I would bet that the serpent is Satan's Modus Operandi. He can use more than a snake. But he definitely whispers temptations to our ears/hearts/spirits. And if we are tempting ourselves – he is happy to help enable those, too. His goal is to wreck God’s plan. Doesn’t he realize he is part of it?

Logically, Satan can’t rely on the spoken word – or we should stop praying and confessing.

He clearly messes with minds – even if it is just by messing with the spirit.

God thinks thoughts are important – so you know Satan cares, too.

Many temptations are from me – but Satan tempts us, the Bible is clear.

When we pray silently, God hears – why shouldn’t Satan also hear?

Here’s the question.

If Satan can read our minds – does it matter?

Here’s the answer?

No. We know Satan knows how to tempt us. And we know Satan tempts us. What matters is how we guard and prepare our hearts for the temptations inevitably coming. 

Sunday, October 09, 2005

Quality Digital Photography

I recently stumbled across an old set of photos I took with my original digital camera.

Back in the day (I was 21 - 11 years ago) digital cameras were inordinately expensive (still sub-$600), very limited in space (32 pictures), very poor in quality (sub-VGA), with no preview, no zoom and pathetic batteries.

It was my grandfather who made it possible for me to get it - introducing me into an era of digital potential far before the ordinary Joe could even understand any potential value of such a gadget.

Anyway, back then I was careful with the pictures I would take. It was like a role of film and when it was out it was out (at least until I could get back to a computer).

These days, in contrast, I have multiple SD cards weighing in at more than a few GB (thousands of pictures or hours and hours of video) and rechargeable lithium batteries that can outlast marathon runners.

What else is different is that I take millions of pictures compared to then. In this set I was just looking at I took a somewhat crooked photo of a colorful tree in autumn. I can remember how hard I tried to make the picture somewhat artistic because I knew I didn't have but a few chances.

Today I would take it crooked, straight, zoomed, from a few angles and exposure settings. It's crazy because there's nothing really limiting. Then the question is - are the photos actually better now that I don't feel the pressure to actually take good pictures?

I will say that having children is an undeniable argument to go digital - if for nothing else, then just to make sure you don't grind your teeth every time the little ones smile and then look away just as the shutter snaps.

Saturday, October 08, 2005

Should I be worried?

Photo off our deck


Should I be worried? I don't know. We were driving home from the circus around 2PM today and I noticed what looks like the smoke from a forrest fire out by Wellington Lake.

When we got home I called 911 and they informed me that Elk Creek Fire Department was already on the scene to investigate some smoke.

This is the end of the summer so the likelihood of a fire is not very high, but there no snow and temperatures are warm and it's been dry for a while. Hopefully this is controled or controllable. I am sure it is.

Thursday, October 06, 2005

Alias Season Five has Started

Alias Season Five has started.

I think it is fair to mention that most shows don't make it past their first season. Yet here we are in the fifth season of Alias. And yet here I am complaining about Alias and still watching it religiously.

The first episode killed Michael, told us Sydney was pregnant, hid Nadia in a coma somewhere, poked Arvin in prison, and did a poor job of introducing some new cast.

The second episode killed the new bad guy (in Alias fashion I might add), took Weiss from the show and introduced Michael's replacement by way of a bar room fight that he lost.

What I read was that the first eight episodes were shot immediately after the forth season before Jennifer Garner was incapacitated by her pregnancy. She came back to shoot some sitting down episodes later and there will be reruns for a while until she is back on her feet. I imagine that's when we'll see our first episodes without Jennifer.

It's official that Jennifer Garner will not be in Season Six if there is to be such a thing.

Right now, I have to give the first episode a very high grade. The second episode had some cool stuff in it, like the Stealth Bomber (although hard to believe). But the prospect for the season right now is not promising, but I will remain faithful - as I have for 4 years already.